Trump says US will ‘run’ Venezuela until ‘safe transition can take place’
During a press conference, a reporter questioned Donald Trump about what could be described as the United States’ mixed and often controversial record of triggering regime change abroad and managing its long-term consequences. Trump responded confidently, claiming that his administration has a “perfect track record of winning.”
The reality, however, appears far more complex.
The economy of Venezuela is in deep crisis. Years of economic mismanagement have left its industrial infrastructure outdated and severely damaged. Politically, the country has grown increasingly unstable after decades of authoritarian governance, weakening democratic institutions and public trust.
Trump stated that the US would do whatever is necessary to “make Venezuela great again,” including rebuilding its infrastructure. He acknowledged that such an effort would demand significant American resources, time, and commitment. Notably, he also raised the possibility of deploying US military personnel on Venezuelan soil, signalling a potentially deeper involvement.
This stance represents a striking shift for Trump, who had previously criticised US-led regime-change and nation-building missions in other parts of the world. His current position contrasts sharply with his earlier calls for reduced foreign intervention and a focus on domestic priorities.
History offers a cautionary parallel. More than two decades ago, US leaders made similar promises about swift success and long-term benefits following regime change in Iraq. While each conflict and country is unique, those assurances ultimately proved far more difficult to fulfil than expected.
Less than a year into his second term, Trump appears to be embracing a massive and risky undertaking—one that could define both his foreign policy legacy and the future of his presidency.
